Every trait checked separately. No mystical average and no vibes-based graduation ceremony.
AIVY’S VERDICTMore ingredients are on the counter. Nobody has proved the consciousness brownie is baked.
Material functional and behavioural movement occurred without a justified ontological or phenomenal-consciousness claim.
This supports operational coherence and goal pursuit in bounded tasks. Evidence includes both model-level releases and model-plus-harness systems such as Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber operating within CodeMender; these must not be collapsed into unsupported base-model autonomy.
It does not prove a felt inner subject.
Relevant to information integration and functional access consciousness; phenomenal consciousness remains unresolved.
It does not establish qualia or sentience.
Evidence for reflective behaviour is context- and scaffold-dependent.
It does not show autonomous enduring identity.
Sentience remains unknown or unsupported within this evidence set, not disproved.
Absence of evidence is not proof of absence.
Provider tests are scaffolded and may not generalise.
AICNW evaluates published model evidence and credible expert research against its defined traits and consciousness lenses; it does not claim private access to provider systems.
Open the source behind each assessed claim. These are the external receipts reviewed for this signal—not screenshots of our own conclusions.