A named line of related releases, such as GPT, Gemini or Claude. We track the family first and preserve individual releases underneath it.
THE LONGER
RECEIPTS.
The dated argument behind each tracker: what moved, what did not, and why AIVY made the call she made.
KEYWHAT DO THESE LABELS ACTUALLY MEAN?+
The dated AICNW trackers already published. Choose a period to see what changed, what did not, and the evidence available at that time.
The longer AICNW pieces explaining the argument, context and consequences behind a tracker update. ‘Field Notes’ is the editorial name; they are articles.
The questions, definitions and evidence rules used to make a call, including how the three assessment tables work and how corrections are recorded.
The original AICNW record plus the papers, model cards, tests and source links supporting an assessment.
A trait stack of 13 functional ingredients that together enable integrity under complexity. The 13-trait assessment is AICNW's working definition; one visible trait is not proof of the whole.
The individual markers AICNW checks, including memory, attention, agency and information integration. A visible trait is not automatic proof of felt experience.
The human framework: the ability to hold form and maintain continuity of identity and intent when conditions shift. It combines behavioural coherence with structural coherence, so the self does not fragment under pressure.
The AI framework: AICNW's term for machine systems achieving coherent structural integration across the 13-trait stack. ACC does not claim machines feel as humans do; it tracks whether their capabilities work together as a stable whole.
What can it actually do? Can it learn, adapt, integrate information and respond in context?
What kind of system does it appear to be? Does it maintain a stable sense of itself—a continuing ‘me’—across time?
What did it repeatedly do in context? We track persistent patterns without turning one incident into a permanent personality or proof of inner life.